Uncovering the Features, Advantages, and Drawbacks of Pico’s Latest Release
Officially launched on October 18th 2022, the Pico Neo 4 has generated excitement, with claims of potentially rivalling the “Quest 2.” This comprehensive review will delve into the headset’s specifications, performance, and whether it lives up to the anticipated hype.
Unveiling and Technical Specifications:
The Pico 4 comes in a package that includes the headset, two controllers, a setup guide, warranty details, a rubber nose gasket, a magnetic glasses spacer, a short USB-C to USB-C charging cable, controller wrist straps, and a power adapter.
The headset features two LCD displays boasting a resolution of 2160 by 2160 pixels per eye, running at up to 90 Hertz. The Pico 4, weighing 586 grams, boasts distinctive pancake lenses for a clear view, driven by the Snapdragon XR2 chipset and 8GB RAM, offering a sleek design.
| Feature | Specification |
|---|---|
| Display 🖥️ | Two LCD displays with a resolution of 2160 x 2160 pixels per eye, running at up to 90 Hertz |
| Weight ⚖️ | 586 grams |
| Lenses 👓 | Distinctive pancake lenses for a clear view |
| Chipset 🚀 | Snapdragon XR2 |
| RAM 🧠 | 8GB |
| Design 🎨 | Sleek and lightweight |
Pico Neo 4: Installation and Initial Observations:
Setting up the Pico 4 is straightforward, requiring a Wi-Fi connection and a Pico account. The innovative IPD adjustment feature, utilizing tiny motors to move the lenses, adds a unique touch. While the headset’s full-color pass-through mode, activated with a double-tap, proves useful for various real-world interactions, it falls short of being suitable for mixed reality applications.
Gaming Experience:
The initial game library is somewhat limited, lacking heavyweight titles present on other platforms. Pico is actively collaborating with developers to expand its game offerings, with The Walking Dead: Saints and Sinners expected to join the Pico store soon.
In comparing the native VR gaming experience of the Pico 4 and the Quest 2, there are minimal differences, aside from the slightly lower brightness of the Pico 4. Additionally, PC VR gaming introduces an intriguing dimension by offering a 90 Hertz option for select applications.
Pico Neo 4: Comfort and Design:
The headset’s form factor is commendable, resembling VR gear from Ready Player One. However, the comfort of the facial interface could be improved, as it tends to apply pressure to the forehead. The fit of the foam could be better, as it allows some light leakage.
Pico Neo 4: Displays, Lenses, and Audio:
While the Pico 4’s LCD displays may not be as bright as the Quest 2’s, they deliver impressive visuals. The pancake lenses offer a broader field of view and higher clarity. The off-ear audio solution is a positive feature, but the absence of a 3.5mm audio jack is a drawback. Bluetooth audio introduces a noticeable delay, making it less practical.
Pico 4: Controllers and Tracking:
The Pico 4 controllers, similar to the Quest 2’s, include an additional face button for screenshots or recording. Robust haptic feedback and generally reliable tracking; occasional issues arose when controllers were positioned at the sides.
Conclusion:
The Pico 4 stands out as a sturdy standalone VR headset, offering a range of features at a competitive price point. Pico’s VR market entry, despite drawbacks like an uncomfortable interface and limited games, signals a promising future. While it may not be a “Quest 2 killer,” it undeniably introduces a compelling option to the VR landscape.
Pico’s ongoing hardware refinement and game library expansion position the Pico 4 as an increasingly appealing option for those seeking alternatives in the VR market. At present, it represents a commendable effort and a positive advancement for Pico in the dynamic realm of virtual reality.
Compare with more professional VR Headsets devices
| VR Headset | Type | Resolution (per eye) | Field of View | Refresh Rate | Tracking Type | Price Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meta Quest Pro | Standalone | 1832 x 1920 | 90° | 72Hz | Inside-out | 💰💰💰 Expensive |
| Oculus Quest 3 | Standalone | 2064×2208 | 110° | 120Hz | Inside-Out | 💰💰 Moderate |
| Oculus Quest 2 | Standalone | 1832 x 1920 | 90° | 90Hz | Inside-out | 💰💰 Moderate |
| HTC Vive Pro | PC-based | 1440 x 1600 | 110° | 90Hz | External | 💰💰💰 High |
| Valve Index | PC-based | 1440 x 1600 | 130° | 120Hz | External | 💰💰💰💰 Very High |
| HTC Vive Cosmos Elite | PC-based | 1440 x 1700 | 110° | 90Hz | External | 💰💰💰 High |